Re: WG Review: General Area Dispatch (gendispatch)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: WG Review: General Area Dispatch (gendispatch)
- From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:47:56 -0700
- Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx>
Dear Ms Kuehlewind,
There is the following sentence in Mr Klensin's email: "The IETF has
a rather long and difficult history, with only a few exceptions since
the POISED and POISSON WGs, of there being two types of process
change proposals". Is that incorrect?
There is also the following sentence: "They, and especially ones that
members of the IESG see as a threat to their authority or the way
they do things and sometimes as adding work, have tended to
vanish". Is the IESG the final authority for all standards decisions?
The term "members of the community" is mentioned in your reply. What
does a person have to do become a member of the community?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Annoucements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Mhonarc]
[Fedora Users]