Re: [regext] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: "Joel Halpern via Datatracker" <noreply@xxxxxxxx>
> 发送时间: 2019-10-11 06:56:18 (星期五)
> 收件人: gen-art@xxxxxxxx
> 抄送: draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration.all@xxxxxxxx, ietf@xxxxxxxx, regext@xxxxxxxx
> 主题: [regext] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11
> 
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review result: Almost Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review Date: 2019-10-10
> IETF LC End Date: None
> IESG Telechat date: 2019-10-17

Dear Joel Halpern,

  Thanks a lot for your kind review.

> 
> Summary: This document is almost ready for publication as an RFC.
> 
> I have received no response to my earlier review.  Some of the items have been
> addressed, but not all of them.
> 
> Major issues:
>     This document clearly defines normative protocol behavior.  As such, it
>     would seem to either be Experimental or Proposed Standard, but not
>     Informational.
> 

Because the WG chair clarified this issue in the mailing list after your review, the WG decided that this document should go to informational. I thought you may be clear about it.
So I did not directly response to this issue. Sorry about it. Some information about this issue from one of the co-chairs:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/wPQdna8E6eHkF4co4XDxrNzHPls#
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/PILROKSKupLTh6tdVuye5b6ou1k



> Minor issues:
>     The document incorporates items from a name space
>     "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:b-dn", referred to with the prefix "b-dn:". 
>     The only explanation of this meaning is in the terminology section.  
>     However, the description does not indicate what document defines this
>     information.
> 

In section 10 "IANA Considerations", the XML namesapce and schema is defined. IANA will add a XML registry for this document at https://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/xml-registry.xml.
IANA is  requested to assignment the two URIs. One is urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:b-dn.
 So the XML information can be checked on this page.

I hope that the above information can answer your concerns.

Thanks a lot.

Jiankang Yao


> Nits/editorial comments:
>     I note and appreciate that my comments on the SHOULD usage in section 7.2
>     has been addressed.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> regext@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux