Re: [Gendispatch] WG Review: General Area Dispatch (gendispatch)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Not sure who wrote this:
    >> I think that we have never really had a problem handling minor process
    >> fixes. That's why we have so many process-related RFCs, in fact. For
    >> those, GENDISPATCH will clearly help us do the triage a bit more
    >> systematically, and that is a Good Thing.

Is the purpose of GENDISPATCH to deal with minor process exceptions, or
fixes?

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
]     mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux