Joel, thanks for your review. I entered a DISCUSS ballot on a couple of other points and asked the authors to address your review in my COMMENT. Alissa > On Sep 8, 2019, at 10:09 PM, Joel Halpern via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-sipcore-callinfo-spam-04 > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review Date: 2019-09-08 > IETF LC End Date: 2019-09-14 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC > > Major issues: N/A > > Minor issues: > ID Nits and inspection of the txt show that the ABNF is formatted with > lines that are too long. While I expect that the RFC Editor can fix this, > it seems safer for the authors to do the repairs themselves. (The shepherd > has indicated they will be fixed, so I am merely including this here to > make sure it is not forgotten.) > > Nits/editorial comments: N/A > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
