Robert, thanks for your review. > On Jun 3, 2019, at 11:58 AM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-acme-ip-06 > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review Date: 2019-06-03 > IETF LC End Date: 2019-06-12 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: Ready for publication as a proposed standard rfc. > > One minor nit: The security considerations section reads oddly. I'm not sure > what it means for an extension to deviate from a threat model. I think you want > to say "does not add to" rather than "does not deviate”? This seems like a useful edit to me. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
