apologies for the double send. > On Oct 1, 2019, at 16:30, Sean Turner <sean@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I am in favor of this proposal. One question below: > >> On Sep 26, 2019, at 23:44, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> f the group decides that a particular topic needs to be addressed by a new >> WG, the normal IETF chartering process will be followed, including, for >> instance, IETF-wide review of the proposed charter. Proposals for large work >> efforts SHOULD lead to a BOF where the topic can be discussed in front of the >> entire IETF community. Documents progressed as AD-sponsored would typically >> include those that are extremely simple or make minor updates to existing >> process documents. > > Is the AD in this case always the IETF Chair? I am somewhat concerned about increasing the workload of the IETF Chair when the I-D might doing something so minor (and possibly noncontroversial) that any AD could sponsor the I-D. > > > spt
