On 11-Sep-19 10:08, Salz, Rich wrote: >>Even if one disagrees with the content of RFC 6635 (which we probably all do, in different ways), there are other, non-Informational documents that specify how to replace it with something that has community consensus. And this ain’t it. > > > > Agree. We have a process/mechanism. One of the worst things we could do is ignore it because “this time it’s different” If it isn't already clear, I strongly disagree. When our self-imposed rules have proved to be problematic, ignoring them is exactly the right thing to do, unless it's illegal. Brian
