Update: the revised draft (link below) has removed the extraneous reference of draft-ietf-rmcat-video-traffic-model. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rmcat-nada-13 Thanks again, Sheng, for your review on this draft. Best, Xiaoqing On 9/3/19, 8:58 AM, "Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)" <xiaoqzhu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Thanks a lot for your review and for catching the glitch in the reference list. Will fix that in the next revision. Best, Xiaoqing On 8/31/19, 3:16 AM, "Sheng Jiang via Datatracker" <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: Reviewer: Sheng Jiang Review result: Has Nits I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This experimental document describes an experimental congestion control scheme called network-assisted dynamic adaptation (NADA). The sender regulates its sending rate based on either implicit or explicit congestion signaling. The document has only described the mechanism and algorithms. This does NOT define any massage format, massage exchanging procedure, etc. therefore, it is NOT a traditional standard document which is mainly for inter-operation purpose. Based on the assumption that such document was also suitable to be published as a RFC, I think this document is clear and well-written. There are a small Nit: draft-ietf-rmcat-video-traffic-model (published as RFC 8593) has been defined as a reference, but not been quoted in the main text. Reviewer: Sheng Jiang Review result: Has NITs
