Re: Why do we need to go with 128 bits address space ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 1:00 AM Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 64 bits

How quaint.  Everybody knows the right answer is 53.

(1) 53 dec is 35 hex.  Wins right away.

(2) 53 bits is all that can be expressed by a _javascript_ integer [RFC7493], and routers are sure migrating from ASICs to _javascript_.

(3) the 32-bit Internet is not going away soon.  We all know a good compromise between 32 and 64 is 48.  Let’s add in 10 % for good measure, making it 52.8, and round up to the next bit, making it 53.

Grüße, Carsten

(Not sure that invoking ATM entirely works like Godwin’s law, but here’s my attempt to kill a useless thread.)


+1
It is useless thread. It persists because of hot summers we are having.

Behcet 

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux