Re: [irtf-discuss] Why do we need to go with 128 bits address space ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Brian Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [irtf-discuss] Why do we need to go with 128 bits address space ?
From: "Mark Allman" <mallman@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:29:06 -0400
Cc: irtf-discuss@xxxxxxxx, 6man@xxxxxxxx, IETF discussion list <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, shyam bandyopadhyay <shyamb66@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CANMZLAat4X+Eh+fgTrbikO6dusvcvvUr5foj=3OEnbRhQtOHSw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPTMOt+cGhBqHmT3yZVChv-PCMqxT-WPDcDdM3RuTc1TMfFeVg@mail.gmail.com> <cd254463-43ba-2afd-5c3c-f462a74e5c30@kit.edu> <CANMZLAat4X+Eh+fgTrbikO6dusvcvvUr5foj=3OEnbRhQtOHSw@mail.gmail.com>

> g) it's 25 years too late for this discussion even if we were wrong

+1

Wow ... just wow ...

allman



--
https://www.icir.org/mallman/
@mallman_icsi

References:
- Why do we need to go with 128 bits address space ?
  - From: shyam bandyopadhyay
- Re: [irtf-discuss] Why do we need to go with 128 bits address space ?
  - From: Roland Bless
- Re: [irtf-discuss] Why do we need to go with 128 bits address space ?
  - From: Brian Carpenter

Prev by Date: Re: [irtf-discuss] Why do we need to go with 128 bits address space ?
Next by Date: Re: Why do we need to go with 128 bits address space ?
Previous by thread: Re: [irtf-discuss] Why do we need to go with 128 bits address space ?
Next by thread: RE: [irtf-discuss] Why do we need to go with 128 bits address space ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux