With Adrian's post about our remote participation technology and
the growing trend to remote participation, I would like to just
post a reaction, while it's fresh in my mind, to being a remote
participant for the first time.
I would like to start by saying that I was very pleased how how
well Meetecho works. I watched the short online tutorial video
(which is a bit out of date, and perhaps should be updated) and
read the support page walkthrough of the various buttons, icons,
etc., and didn't experience any problems during the week. While I
was prepared to virtually raise my hand (I had a headset on just in
case), I found that the integrated jabber window made it
unnecessary - I was able to make my comments via jabber and the
jabber scribe or WG chair read them to the room. I was also able to
use the jabber window to communicate with @Meetcho if there were
any mike or camera issues, and they were EXTREMELY responsive!
I also found Etherpad very useful when it's used. Not all WGs use
it, but I would encourage all of those that don't use it to switch
to it for the live meetings. There was a bit of trouble this
meeting with duplicate Etherpads, but that's a tooling issue that
I'm sure will be addressed for the next meeting. An excellent way
to use Ethernet is prior to the meeting for the WG chair or
secretary to paste in the meeting agenda, and then the notes for
each item on the agenda can just be typed in following each agenda
topic. It's also a good practice that if anyone is going to add to
the Etherpad, they type in their name at the top of the page, so
that their text color can be attributed to them.
Being a remote participant, I did miss the hallway conversations
and such. But I didn't miss the airports, too-cold AC in the rooms,
and other minor annoyances of travel. It's certainly a trade-off.
What could be improved? This probably isn't immediately feasible,
but two cameras in each room (one pointed to the front, the other
to the mike line) would be huge. That way you can watch both ends
of the conversation at once. Also, in the Meetecho UI, it might be
better to increase the size of the camera image and have the camera
image and the slides vertically placed one on top of each other,
rather than the smaller camera image over to the side. Or perhaps
that could be an option. I know that you can make the camera image
larger, but then you lose the slides.
But on the whole, being remote worked much better than I had
expected, and for that I would like to thank everyone that's been
working on making this possible, starting with the Meetecho team.
That said, my preference is still to attend in person if possible.
:-)
Cheers, Andy
