Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Instead, my point was that what you described sounds awfully low level for
> the board to be engaging. Your reply suggested to me that you think it is
> obvious that simpler contracts are better and allow for less (legal)
> exposure
> for the IETF, but that doesn’t actually address my point.
I also felt as Leslie did about this.
Both that this was too-low-level (and I was on the IAOC finance subcmte
before), and I think that your answer missed the point.
> In later parts of the plenary, which you’ll want to catch up with when the
> recording is available, concerns were raised from the community about the
> state of relationship with the people and organizations that are on the
> other end of those contracts. It did make me wonder whether complexity
> of contracts was our biggest exposure — breaking relationships with
> critical expert
> support could actually be a threat with a greater risk factor.
+1
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
