Re: Too many tools, was Things that used to be clear

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Jul 12, 2019, at 7:09 PM, Scott Kitterman <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Friday, July 12, 2019 9:46:52 PM EDT John Levine wrote:
>> In article <20190710190507.GI3215@localhost> you write:
>>> Yeah, it does seem lik the XML hate is mostly just that, but that our
>>> use of XML is not really a blocker.  But these are feelings we're
>>> talking about -- all subjective.
>> 
>> I think the practical difference is between a toolset that is unique
>> to the IETF and one that is more widely used.
>> 
>> It is utterly unclear to me whether better bridge tools would help.  I
>> am pretty sure that with enough effort I could write a two-way
>> converter between xml2rfc and a Microsoft Word file with suitable
>> stylesheets and macros.  (It'd be a lot harder than what Joe has
>> done.)  So you could edit stuff in Word, and revise by importing
>> xml2rfc into Word and then exporting when you're done.  But would
>> anyone use it?
> 
> Certainly not those of us using operating systems for which Word is not 
> relevant.

Which OSes are those?  (LibreOffice works on Linux, MacOS, and Windows, e.g.)

Joe




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux