Re: RFC Editor model

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    > On 24/06/2019 20:05, Ted Hardie wrote:
    >>
    >> If others agree, the question becomes how to address it.  One option
    >> raised by Sean Turner in the context of IASA2 discussions was making
    >> this an employee position whose term is not limited; there are others
    >> as well.

    > FWIW, personally I don't like that employee idea at all for reasons
    > discussed on the iasa2 list. At least not with the current RFC editor
    > model - I think the community would have to have first reached
    > consensus on an RFC editor model 3 but maybe that's what you meant.

What if the IETF were to support a position at a university, that was the RSE?
How would you feel about that?

(I'm not entirely sure how I feel about it yet, it just occured to me)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux