|
Let's get one more clarification:
As far as I can tell, the order in
which things happened was:
1) The RSOC decided to renew then
cancel the contract for "RFP purposes" - that RSOC meeting had the
two IAB members Christian and Robert attending and agreeing.
2) The IAB meeting reviewed the
"decision"/"recommendation" and allowed it to go forward.
3) The RSOC with the IAB's consent or
at least knowledge absent dissent sent a note to Heather
indicating the renew/cancel decision.
4) Heather declined the extension for
the reasons previously stated.
So Q1: Is the above time line
correct? If not please clarify.
Q2: Is there *any* indication that
anyone from the RSOC told Heather this was not the final decision
and that it was subject to IAB approval and subsequent LLC
approval?
Q3: Is there any indication at all that
anyone from the IAB told Heather this was not the final decision?
Q4: Is there any indication at all that
Heather could have come to a conclusion that the decision was not
final from the letter she was sent by the RSOC?
I'm having problems with this being cast as a misunderstanding of the state of the process. Later, Mike
On 6/24/2019 1:39 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
|
