I have the same question that Mike has stated. If this was really done to “revamp the RFP process”, we need people in this role who better understand how RFP processes work. -- Sent from a mobile device; please excuse typos. > On Jun 22, 2019, at 19:30, Michael StJohns <mstjohns@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > My question still stands - why did the IAB/RSOC feel the need to take the termination action 2.5 years prior to the expiration of the renewal - I'm not really buying the "we wanted to revamp the RFP process" statement. Shouldn't that have been the decision of the (differently composed) IAB of 1 or 2 years in the future?
