Re: [Tsv-art] [tram] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-25

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



That text remains insufficient, e.g.:

On Jun 19, 2019, at 7:30 AM, Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy <TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Joe,
 
I have added the following line to address your other comment:
 
Note that the server does not perform per-packet translation for TCP-to-UDP relaying and vice-versa. For TCP-to-UDP relaying from client to peer, the TURN server sets the DF field in the outgoing UDP packet based on the presence of DONT-FRAGMENT attribute in the TURN message. For UDP-to-TCP relaying from peer to client, the TURN server sets IP header fields in the TCP packets on a per-connection basis for the TCP connection.

Which parameters? Based on what?

In addition, a mere note does not undo the implication of indicating each IP parameter (option, DF) separately as if there are always configurable per-TURN message.

Joe

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux