Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For me a big question is whether weather reports should use RFC2119
> language,
> which makes it easy for an outsider to mistake them for standards.
Hmm. Good point.
> But yes, https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-klensin-isdbis-00
> I don't think that ignoring that idea has served the IETF well.
Maybe we are ready for this now?
If it eliminates the need to publish so many -bis documents, then that would
seem to reduce some of the same pain that roach-bis is trying to reduce.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
