Hi Tom,
You are right. ODUCn is introduced in ITU-T G709-2016 - RFC7139 only covered G709-2012.
I noticed some expired IETF I-D(s) tried to bring in support for ODUCn but aborted: draft-merge-ccamp-otn-b100g-fwk and draft-ali-ccamp-oducn-signal-type.
I will discuss with authors to remove this identity from those defined in this document.
Regards,
Tarek
On 5/29/19, 7:04 AM, "Teas on behalf of tom petch" <teas-bounces@xxxxxxxx on behalf of daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
One of the identities defined herein is
ODUCn
with a reference of RFC7139.
I see no mention of ODUCn in RFC 7139 nor can I find it in the IANA
registries for GMPLS
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx>
To: "IETF-Announce" <ietf-announce@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types@xxxxxxxx>; <teas-chairs@xxxxxxxx>;
<teas@xxxxxxxx>; <db3546@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2019 9:47 PM
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-09.txt> (Traffic
Engineering Common YANG Types) to Proposed Standard
>
> The IESG has received a request from the Traffic Engineering
Architecture and
> Signaling WG (teas) to consider the following document: - 'Traffic
> Engineering Common YANG Types'
> <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-09.txt> as Proposed Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final
> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2019-05-16. Exceptionally, comments may
be
> sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of
> the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
> This document defines a collection of common data types and
groupings
> in YANG data modeling language. These derived common types and
> groupings are intended to be imported by modules that model Traffic
> Engineering (TE) configuration and state capabilities.
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
