Hi Russ,
Thank you for your review. New version was submitted with corrections. Please find answer in-line.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 8:34 PM Russ Housley via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review result: Ready with Nits
Minor Concerns:
Section 1 says:
... This document clarifies examples that intend to
illustrate the result of the normative language in RFC8200 and
RFC6553. In other words, the examples are intended to be normative
explanation of the results of executing that language.
This set the wrong expectation for me. What the document seems to
be doing is aligning with the recent normative change in RFC8200. The
alignment could lead to a flag day, and this document suggests a way to
avoid a flag day. It goes through a whole bunch of use cases to
illustrate the updates.
New text was added to adress this:
"The ROLL WG analysized how [RFC2460] rules apply to storing and non-
storing use of RPL. The result was 24 data plane use cases. They
are exhaustively outlined here in order to be completely unambiguous.
During the processing of this document, new rules were published as
[RFC8200], and this document was updated to reflect the normative
changes in that document. "
Nits:
In Table 6, please move some of the whitespace on the right to the first
column to avoid so many words being split across lines.
Tables were fixed.
All the Best,
Ines
