Re: I-D Action: draft-roach-bis-documents-00.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,
    
>       4.  The document SHOULD contain an appendix detailing the changes
>           from the RFC it is replacing.  Any change for which the rationale
>           is not abundantly obvious should be explained in this appendix.
>    
>    I don't see why an appendix is stipulated.  Concise descriptions of changes in introductory sections are often a very welcome way to explain differences.
  
Whether it's an Appendix or not, I think having a dedicated "Changes from RFC number-of-the-obsoleted-RFC" is good. 

Regards,

Christer
    
    





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux