On Sun, May 5, 2019, at 8:53 PM, Eric Burger wrote:
I am not convinced “Kumar Xplorer” is a human.
Maybe, maybe not. I think, though, that if one just applies the BCP 83 standard vis a vis disruption that that settles the matter, regardless.
Stan
‘He’ sent an email to a long-dead IETF mail list, with an incoherent body text, sent to a ton of non-human email addresses, only a few that resolve to ietf.org, that looked scraped from the Internet.Let’s block the address and move on.On May 5, 2019, at 6:26 PM, Stan Kalisch <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:FWIW, Mr. Kumar Xplorer's postings (a number of which are included in the samples below) created enough difficulty for me in reviewing some mailing lists that I've already simply blackholed mail from any of his addresses that I could find.Thanks,StanOn Fri, May 3, 2019, at 5:09 PM, Adam Roach wrote:The ART area directors have received a request from several individuals torevoke the posting rights to IETF mailing lists of Pradeep Kumar Xplorer asper the procedures in BCP 83 (RFC 3683).The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits finalcomments on this action. Please send substantive comments to themailing lists by 2019-03-17. Exceptionally, comments may be sent toallowautomated sorting.PLEASE NOTE: Comments should be limited to the criteria described in BCP 83,specifically in this case whether the person has posted "discussion ofsubjects unrelated to IETF policy, meetings, activities, or technicalconcerns" or "unprofessional commentary, regardless of the general subject",and whether such posts have had an effect to "disrupt the consensus-drivenprocess." In particular, IT IS INAPPROPRIATE TO MAKE COMMENTS ABOUT THEPOSTER'S STATE OF MIND WHILE MAKING THESE POSTS OR WHETHER THE POSTSHAVE SOMEBROADER MEANING OUTSIDE OF THE IETF PROCESS. The questions posed by thisLastCall are whether the posts are off-topic, whether the posts disrupt theprocess, and whether the PR-action is the appropriate remedy.The following is an incomplete sampling of messages that have beenidentifiedas being potentially off-topic and disrupting:/Adam RoachAttachments:
- signature.asc
