Re: /.well-known (RFC5785) vs versioned APIs [and EST/RFC7030]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Nico Williams <nico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: /.well-known (RFC5785) vs versioned APIs [and EST/RFC7030]
From: Kent Watsen <kent@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 20:58:52 +0000
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Feedback-id: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
In-reply-to: <20190501185523.GE26704@localhost>
References: <23402.1551030882@localhost> <CAMm+LwiL8X_+3jOmQrQq5BbT=bZ=Ok6mkDNnxEOo9V6Lg8MtzA@mail.gmail.com> <20190501185523.GE26704@localhost>

Have you considered RFC 6415 with its /.well-known/host-meta for versioning? This is what RFC 8040 (RESTCONF) uses for versioning.

Kent

References:
- /.well-known (RFC5785) vs versioned APIs [and EST/RFC7030]
  - From: Michael Richardson
- Re: /.well-known (RFC5785) vs versioned APIs [and EST/RFC7030]
  - From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: /.well-known (RFC5785) vs versioned APIs [and EST/RFC7030]
  - From: Nico Williams

Prev by Date: Re: /.well-known (RFC5785) vs versioned APIs [and EST/RFC7030]
Next by Date: Re: Genart last call review of draft-housley-hkdf-oids-01
Previous by thread: Re: /.well-known (RFC5785) vs versioned APIs [and EST/RFC7030]
Next by thread: Re: /.well-known (RFC5785) vs versioned APIs [and EST/RFC7030]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux