Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> And since I looked at the agenda, I also looked back to the last
> minutes where I found:
> "All incoming board members have signed Conflict of Interest
> disclosures. These will not be posted publicly, but have been filed
> internally."
> Can you explain how this is consistent with the "public unless
> otherwise justified in advance" approach that I think was the intent
> for the LLC board's activities?
> It also seems to be somewhat illogical - if the CoI disclosure is to
> protect the community against LLC board member conflicts, I don't see
> how that works if the community are unaware of the potential
> conflicts. Where are I wrong there?
Good question.
I can see that there can be reasons to keep some relationships confidential,
but perhaps those relationships could be numbered abstractly, so that when a
board member recluses themselves, they could cite "Conflict-123", and we'd know how
often "123" is involed.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
