Le 17/04/2019 à 16:27, 神明達哉 a écrit :
At Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:56:39 +0200,
Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:alexandre.petrescu@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> [...]> Note also that MacOS is derived from BSD in case you don't
> > remember/know it. And, in fact it also generates both "fe80::1" and
> > "::1" on the "lo0" interface.
>
> Right, I forgot that.
>
> But there is something I never knew for sure.
>
> Are BSD flavors supporting OCB options?
I don't know, but I don't think it matters here anyway:
Maybe it matters, maybe it does not matter.
If BSD does not support OCB, why should we write an IP-over-OCB spec
along the lines of BSD which does not accept fe80:1::1 in the first place?
Were BSD to support OCB then indeed we would be reluctant in writing a
spec which outlaws fe80:1::1.
Alex
this particular
sub-thread is already an off-topic for draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.
--
JINMEI, Tatuya
