The sentence > > " Among these types of addresses only the IPv6 link-local addresses > > MAY be formed using an EUI-64 identifier. " is the logical equivalent to "non LL Addresses MAY NOT be formed using an EUI-64 identifier". This should be said in a section that discusses non LL Addresses. All the best, Pascal > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: lundi 8 avril 2019 17:45 > To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: int-dir@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; its@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over- > 80211ocb.all@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Intdir early review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-34 - > title of the section 4.3 on LLs > > > Le 04/03/2019 à 12:24, Pascal Thubert a écrit : > > Reviewer: Pascal Thubert Review result: Not Ready > [...] > > " Among these types of addresses only the IPv6 link-local addresses > > MAY be formed using an EUI-64 identifier. " > > > > This text should not be in a LL specific section since it deals with > > the other addresses. Maybe rename the section to "addressing" or > > something? > > The titles of these sections come directly from the RFC2464 IPv6-over- > Ethernet. > > The title of this section is 'Link-Local Addresses' and as such it has the Address > root in it. > > The text deals indeed with other kinds of addresses, in that it says 'There are > several types of IPv6 addresses'. But then it gets specific to LL addresses. The > 'MAY' keyword is only applied to LL addresses. > > As such, I do not understand why do you think it deals with the other kinds of > addresses (non LL)? > > Alex
