RE: Intdir early review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-34 - MAC and IID Generation - MAY

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I think that the sentence can just be removed without any loss.

All the best,

Pascal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: lundi 8 avril 2019 17:49
> To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: int-dir@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; its@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-
> 80211ocb.all@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Intdir early review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-34 -
> MAC and IID Generation - MAY
> 
> 
> Le 04/03/2019 à 12:24, Pascal Thubert a écrit :
> > Reviewer: Pascal Thubert Review result: Not Ready
> >
> [...]
> > " For privacy, the link-local address MAY be formed according to the
> > mechanisms described in Section 5.2. "
> 
> > The MAY is not helpful. I suggest to remove the sentence that does not
> > bring value vs. 5.2
> To better understand: do you want to remove the phrase and promote the
> section 5.2 "MAC Address and Interface ID Generation"?
> 
> (the restrain I have from promoting it is that I did not see 5.2 implemented;
> neither do I know the IPR status of it)
> 
> Alex




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux