Le 04/03/2019 à 12:24, Pascal Thubert a écrit :
Reviewer: Pascal Thubert
Review result: Not Ready
[...]
BCP 14 text:
Suggest to use this text:
“
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
https://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp14 https://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp14
[https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119][RFC8174] when, and only when, they
appear in all capitals, as shown here.
“
I will add it, thank you. I want to be up to date with most recent specs.
But here are my worries about it for what is worth:
- I dont understand though why the need to say 'capitals' when in
CAPITALS is it written.
- I thought that a BCP document was just one RFC. Here we seem to be
talking about BCP-14 being both RFC2119 and RFC8174.
A google search on BCP-14 hits first on RFC 2119, and a document called
'bcp14' (not on RFC8174). https://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp14
The second hit is a page at RFC Editor which points to a "Canonical URL"
towards https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp14.txt which does not talk
about RFC8174 either.
It then points to https://www.rfc-editor.org/refs/ref-bcp14.txt
That ref points back to a web page telling the "Canonical URL".
- finally, the text ends with 'as shown here', which invites my reading
to think that what follows needs to be understood with these capitals.
And what follows is the definition of terms like "IP-OBU", etc. That is
worrisome. You can understand the worry if you read it as a whole:
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
IP-OBU (Internet Protocol On-Board Unit): an IP-OBU is a computer
situated in a vehicle such as an automobile, bicycle, or similar. It
has at least one IP interface that runs in mode OCB of 802.11, and
that has an "OBU" transceiver. See the definition of the term "OBU"
in section Appendix I.
The dot after 'here' is very important, but so small. A quick or
low-sighted reader may see it as double dots. And that would be a
problem, because the "IP-OBU" term definition is not suject to that
capitalization.
Alex
