Hi Stephen, FWIW, a new version that integrates your comments is available online. The diff can be tracked at: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-31.txt Please let me know if you have further comments. Thank you. Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Stephen Farrell [mailto:stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx] > Envoyé : vendredi 15 mars 2019 11:20 > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN; secdir@xxxxxxxx > Cc : draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel.all@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; > dots@xxxxxxxx > Objet : Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-30 > > > Hiya, > > On 15/03/2019 06:47, mohamed.boucadair@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> ISTM that all clients can get information > >> about how an attack is being seen at other clients, isn't that > >> right? > > [Med] No. A client can only get information that is bound to it. > Where does the spec say that? I don't recall the term "bound" > used that way but may have missed it. > > And it still seems a bit hard to enforce. If two clients (one > ok, one zombied) ask the same server/network how many packets > targetted at 10.0.0/24 were dropped won't they get the same > answer? (Assuming both clients are within that /24.) > > Thanks, > S.
