Thanks!
Just reading this before breakfast and thus without coffee.
It's good work, thanks.
A few small comments below.
Best,
Adrian
===
Abstract
The procedures for initiating a recall specified in RFC 7437 restrict
signatories to those who are "nomcom qualified".
s/signatories/signatories of a recall petition/
---
Abstract
s/limitations were/limitations had/
---
2.3 has some confused punctuation
OLD
That sets a very high barrier for a recall petition
even though the recall petition requires a, justification, an
investigation by a Recall Committee and a 3/4 majority of the members
of the Recall Committee who vote on the recall decision.
NEW
That sets a very high barrier for a recall petition
even though the recall petition requires a justification, an
investigation by a Recall Committee, and a 3/4 majority of the members
of the Recall Committee who vote on the recall decision.
END
---
Because it comes before the exposition of how many signatures you are
proposing, I would add to 2.3 something to the effect of...
OLD
This
document also proposes to decrease the number of signatures required
to avoid making it impractical to invoke the first step of the recall
procedures.
NEW
While recognising that some form of barrier is a good thing to prevent
capricious use of recall petitions, this
document also proposes to decrease the number of signatures required
to avoid making it impractical to invoke the first step of the recall
procedures.
END
---
For completeness, I think this document should also note that 7776 made an
update to 7437 as follows...
3.1. Recall Petitions Initiated by the Ombudsteam
[RFC7776] updates [RFC7437] by allowing the
Ombudsteam to form a recall petition on its own and without
requiring signatories from the community. This document
does not make any change to [RFC7776] or the Ombudsteam
procedures and any petition originating from the Ombudsteam
shall be treated in all ways like any other recall petition as
described in [RFC7437]: that is, the fact of the petition and its
signatories (the Ombudsteam) shall be announced to the IETF
community, and a Recall Committee Chair shall be appointed
to complete the Recall Committee process.
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of S Moonesamy
Sent: 24 March 2019 22:11
To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Recall process
Hello,
At 09:40 AM 23-03-2019, John C Klensin wrote:
>I trust he will pursue the issue via an I-D, which will at least
>help focus the
>discussion. He may list me as co-author because of the original
The I-D is at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moonesamy-recall-rev-00 I would
like to have your feedback on the I-D.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
