> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of S Moonesamy > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 12:49 AM > To: Jiankang Yao <yaojk@xxxxxxxx>; ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration- > 09.txt> (Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Domain Name Mapping > Extension for Strict Bundling Registration) to Informational RFC > > Hi Jiankang, > At 03:28 PM 01-03-2019, The IESG wrote: > >The IESG has received a request from the Registration Protocols > >Extensions WG > >(regext) to consider the following document: - 'Extensible Provisioning > >Protocol (EPP) Domain Name Mapping Extension > > for Strict Bundling Registration' > > <draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-09.txt> as Informational > >RFC > > > >The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > >final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > >ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2019-03-15. Exceptionally, comments may > >be > > I would like to thank the authors/editors for taking internationalization into > consideration for this draft. > > The registration details in Section 10 for the "Extensions for the Extensible > Provisioning Protocol (EPP)" registry mentions "IPR Disclosure". If I am not > mistaken, it is unusual for the protocol parameters registry to contain this > type of information. The "tools" > information for draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-09 does not show the > IPR disclosure which was mentioned in the Last Call announcement. That > information is also not available in the relevant registration field for the > registry. Did the designated experts for the registry review this registration > request [1]? The expert review request was sent yesterday. The expert (me) will complete the review in a few minutes. Scott
