On Feb 25, 2019, at 6:11 AM, Loa Andersson <loa@xxxxx> wrote:
How would they do that? What information do they have now that they didn’t have before they published the agenda? I ask because in fact, this agenda is the least conflicted one for me that I have seen in a long time. I’m really happy with the current agenda, and can really only lose from a re-do. This is not to say that a re-do is not the right thing to do. What I’m saying is that the fact that a couple of people have griped about conflicts and about an over-full agenda is not data. It is anecdata. As Stewart has said, if we want to do better at this, we need data, not anecdata. |
