Re: Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-08

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Erik!

> On 6 Feb 2019, at 6:10 pm, Erik Kline <ek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> [1] I assume the URIs in 6.3 are also meant to be deleted upon publication?

Not all of them; just the ones referenced from the section that's marked for deletion.


> [2] WRT to the final lines of 5.1:
> 
>    [a] "Replace all references to RFC 5988 in that registry have been
>    replaced..." doesn't scan well, I think.
> 
>    [b] If the IANA repo in question is
>    https://www.iana.org/assignments/well-known-uris/well-known-uris.xhtml, I
>    don't see any mention of 5988 in there.

That's been removed since, as a result of another review.


> [3] Naive question: do we want a statement about reserving/agreeing to never
> allocate "example" in the .well-known space?

Good question! I'm neutral on this; does anyone have strong feelings?

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux