Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-24

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Pete Resnick <resnick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-24
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 19:56:39 -0800
Cc: gen-art@xxxxxxxx, draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis.all@xxxxxxxx, ietf@xxxxxxxx, lisp@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <154942103074.32279.4509839048441396108@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <154942103074.32279.4509839048441396108@ietfa.amsl.com>

> Nits/editorial comments: Section 2: Get rid of everything except the last paragraph.

Are you sure? I just followed what RFC 8174 suggested. Give me reason to not follow it?

Dino

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-24
  - From: Benjamin Kaduk

References:
- Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-24
  - From: Pete Resnick

Prev by Date: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-10
Next by Date: Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-24
Previous by thread: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-24
Next by thread: Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-24
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux