On 02/02/2019 13:30, Bernard Aboba wrote:
With respect to consensus, this is IETF last call, one of whose purposes is to determine whether there is IETF consensus to publish this document as a Proposed Standard. Are you saying that you do not agree that there is an IETF consensus to publish this document as a Proposed Standard? Or that there is no IETF consensus to publish *any* of the PERC WG output as a Proposed Standard?
The consensus we reached in Prague almost two years ago was that despite many of us didn't like the solution and while it would huge impact to implement it in current deployed based, it was technically feasible and we would not oppose getting this go trough as that it could be possible to progress alternative solutions (namely PERC lite and js keying) in other forums.
However the end to end encryption with trusted application use case had to be removed from the w3c nv scope because it was against what has been defined within this group. Given that, I would say that the previous consensus has been broken.
Best regards Sergio
