On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:49:25PM +0000, lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > +1 to Bob's unanswered question. and why is this new list ietf-and-github > and not ietf-and-git? github is but one provider, backed by a proven > monopolist... and that was the choice? that's a question suitable for > this general list. So, on this thread topic, what viable alternatives are > there? Suitable perhaps, but hardly timely (nor the list "new") -- per https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-and-github/S5nDGwYKMOCe7l3ghcCeZItHExk the list is three years old tomorrow. -Ben
