On 10 Jan 2019, at 4:56, Salz, Rich wrote:
What it introduces is the tight coupling of two previously-distinctactions for the relying party:I don't see it that way. Nobody is forcing relying parties to couple things.
DKG didn't say that the new extension is forcing relying parties to do this, but it is giving them a way to do so. There are obvious benefits to coupling rollout and revocation, so this document should be clear on all the decisions that would go along with doing so.
--Paul Hoffman