Reviewer: Linda Dunbar Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448-?? Reviewer: Linda Dunbar Review Date: 2019-01-06 IETF LC End Date: 2019-01-04 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This document proposes two names for public key algorithms (which are specified by other RFCs): ssh-ed25519 & ssh-ed448 Major issues: There is no "Standard" being specified by this document. The document has a few sentences to explain "public key algorithm for use with SSH in accordance with RFC4253, RFC4251" and give a name. and One sentence to say "Signatures are generated according to the procedure in RFC8032". I don't understand why it is "Standard Track" document, non do I understand why it is a WG document. Does it take a whole WG to come out with a name for an algorithm specified in an RFC? Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: Linda Dunbar
