Hi Scott, On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 12:32:55PM -0800, Scott Bradner wrote: > Reviewer: Scott Bradner > Review result: Has Nits > > This is an OPS-DIR review of Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Open Threat > Signaling Requirements (draft-ietf-dots-requirements) > > This document lists requirements for a protocol to used between providers of > DDOS mitigation services and users of such services, as such there can be no > direct operational issues with the document. I also did not find any indirect > operational issues. > > I think the document would benefit from the addition of a section before the > requirements section that specifically describes the setup assumed by the > document. The descriptions before there hint at a presumed setup but a new > section that clearly states the setup would be helpful. (the setup appears to > be one where all network traffic to and from a protected entity flows through a > DDoS mitigation service provider. The provider includes one or more DOTS > servers. The protected entity includes one or more DOTS clients that > communicate with the DOTS servers) Just to double-check: you think that the reference to draft-ietf-dots-architecture is insufficient in this regard? Thanks, Ben > Requirement SIG-005 addresses channel redirection – maybe there needs to be a > way that clients can move to a new server on their own if they lose hearbeat > from the server they were using – that might include a way for a server to > provide a list of alternative servers to the clients > >
