Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-06.txt> (Recommendations on the Filtering of IPv6 Packets Containing IPv6 Extension Headers) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 12:30 PM Nick Hilliard <nick@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Brian E Carpenter wrote on 24/11/2018 20:17:
> > Operators make their own
> > decisions, so I think that is what the draft should say. Something like:
> >
> > 3.5.5.  Advice
> >
> >     Operators should determine according to their own circumstances
> >     whether to discard packets containing unknown IPv6 EHs.
> >
> > And at the same time, delete the 2nd and 3rd sentences of this:
> >
> > 3.5.3.  Specific Security Implications
> >
> >     For obvious reasons, it is impossible to determine specific security
> >     implications of unknown IPv6 EHs.  However, from security standpoint,
> >     a device should discard IPv6 extension headers for which the security
> >     implications cannot be determined.  We note that this policy is
> >     allowed by [RFC7045].
>
> This looks like a sensible approach.

I could live with that.  Similar changes might be considered for Sec. 4.4.5.

Mike Heard




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux