Hi Tom, Thank you for the review. Please see inline. Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : tom petch [mailto:daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Envoyé : vendredi 28 septembre 2018 18:13 > À : ietf@xxxxxxxx > Cc : softwires@xxxxxxxx; softwire-chairs@xxxxxxxx; jiangsheng@xxxxxxxxxx; > terry.manderson@xxxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-softwire-yang@xxxxxxxx > Objet : Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-softwire-yang-06.txt> (YANG Modules for > IPv4-in-IPv6 Address plus Port Softwires) to Proposed Standard > > I believe that this I-D needs some admin-type changes to make it usable. > > All three modules import some or all of > > ietf-inet-types > ietf-interfaces > iana-if-type > ietf-softwire-common > > These imports should have YANG reference statements identifying the > relevant RFC, probably > 6991 > 8343 > 7244 > XXXX [Med] Added reference statements for those. > > and these need to be Normative References for the I-D; 8343 is, 6991 is > not. > > The first two modules have a sentence mentioning the use of RFC6991; > this should mention all the modules referenced, those above and > RFC7596 > RFC7597 > RFC7599: > these last are already Normative References. A similar sentence is > needed for the third module for the RFC that it references. [Med] Done. > > The third module is a bit light on references - I cannot see any! > > There are three references to RFC XXX- I suspect that RFC XXXX is > intended. > [Med] Yes. > IANA Considerations references RFC7950 - this is a poor reference since > all it says is 'Go look at RFC6020' which thus should be the reference > here. [Med] OK. > > Security Considerations starts "The YANG module defined in this document > ... > Give us a clue - there are three of them:-) > > Appendix A. Configutation Examples > [Med] Fixed. > Tom Petch > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> > To: "IETF-Announce" <ietf-announce@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: <softwires@xxxxxxxx>; <softwire-chairs@xxxxxxxx>; > <jiangsheng@xxxxxxxxxx>; <terry.manderson@xxxxxxxxx>; > <draft-ietf-softwire-yang@xxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 1:06 PM > > > > > The IESG has received a request from the Softwires WG (softwire) to > consider > > the following document: - 'YANG Modules for IPv4-in-IPv6 Address plus > Port > > Softwires' > > <draft-ietf-softwire-yang-06.txt> as Proposed Standard > > > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final > > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2018-10-11. Exceptionally, comments may > be > > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of > > the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > > > Abstract > > > > This document defines YANG modules for the configuration and > > operation of IPv4-in-IPv6 softwire Border Relays and Customer > > Premises Equipment for the Lightweight 4over6, MAP-E, and MAP-T > > softwire mechanisms. > > > > Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor) > > > > Please update these statements within this document with the RFC > > number to be assigned to this document: > > > > o "This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX;" > > > > o "RFC XXXX: YANG Modules for IPv4-in-IPv6 Address plus Port > > Softwires"; > > > > o "reference: RFC XXXX" > > > > Please update the "revision" date of the YANG module. > > > > The file can be obtained via > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-yang/ > > > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-yang/ballot/ > > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.