This I-D has two quirks that catch my eye, one IPR-related, the other process-related. The URI relates to a medium for publishing content and services on the Internet, which has been given a name, by OP3FT which, the I-D informs us, is a registered trademark which the IETF has a perpetual license to use as part of the scheme name. Given the lack of integrity and source authentication in I-Ds, and indeed in RFC, is this statement in the I-D enough to convey legal rights, or should there be a more secure mode of transmission of this grant to the IETF, which the I-D could then reference? Related to this, the I-D has the usual BCP 78 and BCP 79 boiler plate so I can take text from this I-D, including the trademarked name, and incorporate it in an I-D of my own, e.g. comparing and contrasting the different URI schemes. Do I need to acknowledge this name in such an I-D as a trademark since this grant to the IETF seems very limited in scope, not encompassing such use? Indeed, I have avoided using the name in this e-mail lest I fall foul of such an issue. The process issue is that the I-D contains instructions to the RFC Editor to excise Section 3; I consider this wrong, verging on an abuse of process. If this section is needed to be part of IETF Last Call then it should be in the RFC. The information in it, about the reasons for the choice of name and its relationship to the trademarked name, I consider a useful, if not quite essential, part of the process. It may - SHOULD - belong in an Informative Appendix, but telling the RFC Editor to remove content post-Last Call is, to me, wrong. Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> To: "IETF-Announce" <ietf-announce@xxxxxxxx> Cc: <alexey.melnikov@xxxxxxxxx>; <draft-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme@xxxxxxxx>; <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 5:43 PM > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the > following document: - 'The 'leaptofrogans' URI Scheme' > <draft-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme-03.txt> as Informational RFC > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2018-11-13. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of > the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > This document describes the 'leaptofrogans' Uniform Resource > Identifier (URI) scheme, which enables applications to launch Frogans > Player on a given Frogans site. Frogans is a medium for publishing > content and services on the Internet, defined as a generic software > layer on the Internet. Frogans Player is software enabling end users > to browse Frogans sites. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme/ba llot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
