> On Aug 30, 2018, at 2:57 AM, Brian Trammell (IETF) <ietf@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > hi Dino, > > Almost. How about: > > > OLD: > > When the UDP and LISP headers require integrity protection, the > methods of using UDP checksums in [RFC8085] can be considered. > > NEW: > > Implementors are encouraged to consider UDP checksum usage guidelines in section 3.4 of [RFC8085]. Specifically, when the UDP, LISP, and outer IPv6 headers require protection against corruption, the use of non-zero UDP checksums is RECOMMENDED. Well if we recommend it and when describing the UDP header in the packet format section we don’t that woudl be a contracdiction. And note the IPv6 outer header cannot be protected with a UDP checksum. The link-layer CRC will do that. NEWNEW: Implementors are encouraged to consider UDP checksum usage guidelines in section 3.4 of [RFC8085] when it is desirable to protect UDP and LISP headers against corruption. What do you think? Dino
