On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018, Ólafur Guðmundsson wrote:
Ted, Would it be acceptable to just do
s/TCP/Connection oriented Transport/
For RFC 7901 we used "source-IP-verified transport"
If this is the only characteristic that the working group believes will cause variance in ANY responses, then reusing this terminology seems fine. I suspect, however, that it is not the only characteristic that will in practice. I can easily imagine cases where ANY returns full answers when the transport is confidential and minimal ones when it is not.
I have absolutely no data to back this intuition, though, so I will understand if the working group and authors disagree.
regards,
Ted Hardie
Paul
