Hi Paul,
Thank you for the timely and to-the-points answer. Thanks for addressing my comments, I will not insist on items that you decided to leave as they are, it's up to the OPS ADs to raise the issue if they consider any of these important enough.. As I said, I believe that the document is Ready from an OPS-DIR perspective, and none of the comments is a show-stopper.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 6, 2018, at 1:55 AM, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 8. I found the Index to be very useful, and I wish other documents of this size
> and complexity (or worse) include such a section.
Thanks, this is good to hear. (And I say that as the co-author who objected strenuously to adding the index because no one uses them...)
--Paul Hoffman
Maybe it's because communities that are less dealing with the terminology on the day-to-day basis are the ones that need more such Index sessions?
Regards,
Dan
