On 8/1/18 7:28 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > a lot of folk seem to be assuming financial rewards and penalties are > principal factors. are there data to suppor this assumption? Anecdotally, on the occasions when I've had to decline a nomination, when I was consulting the issue was the money. When I've been working for someone else the issue has been time. I expect there may be other issues as well, but it's not at all clear to me that the singular problem that's limiting the candidate pool is money. I think the proposal to pay ADs (ack, ptooey) is premised on the time == money equality. Melinda
