On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 9:33 AM Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:42:53PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote: > > >> The IESG has received a request from the SIDR Operations WG (sidrops) to > > >> consider the following document: - 'Origin Validation Clarifications' > > >> <draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-clarify-03.txt> as Internet Standard > > > The intended status seems incorrect. > > > > from the abstract > > > > This document is meant to clarify possible misunderstandings causing > > those mis-implementations; and thus updates RFC6811 by clarifying > > 6811 claims to be proposed standard, not internet standard. Yup, it (clearly) should be PS - it is entirely my fault. The draft header says: Standards Track, and I just assumed that the status in the Data Tracker matched, but didn't actually check. This has now been fixed in the DT. Apologies for the mistake. W > > -Ben > > > that all prefixes should be marked, and that policy must not be > > applied without operator configuration" > > > -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
