Hi Linda,
thank you for the review and your kind words, much appreciated.
If an end-point during the p2mp BFD session never responded to the head's multicast poll it is unknown to the head and cannot be reported as "inactive tail". I can imagine that if the head has been given the list of the tails, then the unresponsive end-point can be reported as "inactive tails".
Regards,
Greg
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Linda Dunbar <Linda.dunbar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq >.
Document: draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail-??
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review Date: 2018-06-28
IETF LC End Date: 2018-06-18
IESG Telechat date: 2018-07-05
Summary: clear writing of the procedure.
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
Are End points that not responding considered "Inactive Tails"? Does the
HeadEnd report the "Inactive Tails"?
Linda Dunbar
