on a related note, we need an established April Fools workgroup with a published charter and clear path for draft adoption and RFC publication. jokes are funnier once they've been workshopped... Lloyd Wood lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx http://about.me/lloydwood ; On Wednesday, 27 June 2018, 05:04:32 GMT+10, Toerless Eckert <tte@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: If the corrected draft can still get through IESG review and get an RFC number, i do not see the problem. ;-) On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 09:24:19AM -0500, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > Funny indeed. You understand better after seeing the pictures. > A picture is worth a thousand words. > > Behcet > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 8:52 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > http://dilbert.com/strip/2018-06-26 > > > > "I reviewed your draft and deleted stuf that was WRONG" > > "These pages are BLANK" > > "You asked me to be thorough" > > > > -- > > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works > > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
