On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 03:29:35PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote: > > i assume a missing cite is not an erratum. so maybe nothing can be done > other than to encourage authors to be more careful. in general, the I tend to agree with that assumption, but am not sure that nothing at all can be done. There may be room for something analogous to an academic review paper that covers the history of a given field and cites all the known relevant work, as a way to tie them together. Though this would not qualify for standards-track (and would make using an Updates: header difficult), one could perhaps make an argument for BCP. Even Informational would probably still have value, though. -Ben
